MAJ Carrera Posted December 5, 2017 The United States Army is looking to replace its Blackhawk, Chinook, Kiowa and Apache helicopters through the Future Vertical Lift (FVL) Program that started in 2009. Replacement of the air frames are expected to start around 2030. There are 4 contenders in this program, 2 Co-axial helicopters and 2 Tilt-rotor aircraft. I have compiled a spreadsheet of the projected stats of the air frames. I would like to keep this up to date as more info comes out as long as there is interest for it, feel free to discuss below. Looks like the future of helicopters is in one of the two dual rotor designs lets see which it is... Lockheed Martin/Boeing The SB-1 Defiance and its little brother the S-97 Raider Bell The V-280 Valor Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SSgt (Ret) Derr Posted December 5, 2017 Soooooo everyone gets an osprey? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capt (Ret) Pepperman Posted December 5, 2017 Why do they all look gross and icky. Don't take way my blackhawk damnit! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest G. Miller Posted December 5, 2017 https://forums.bistudio.com/forums/topic/195450-bell-v-280-valor/?page=4&tab=comments#comment-3228085 Is this the very same one? Currently being built to Arma 3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SSgt (Ret) Derr Posted December 5, 2017 (edited) 8 hours ago, 2ndLt Pepperman said: Why do they all look gross and icky. Don't take way my blackhawk damnit! Icky? No wonder you're afraid of birds . Edited December 5, 2017 by SSgt Derr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MAJ Carrera Posted December 5, 2017 10 hours ago, LCpl G. Miller said: Is this the very same one? yes good to see someones taking initiative but my money is on the defiance; smaller, holds about the same amount of troops and much faster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GySgt Cole Posted December 5, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, CW3 Carrera said: yes good to see someones taking initiative but my money is on the defiance; smaller, holds about the same amount of troops and much faster. Plus Sikorsky has a pretty good track record with crazy new airframes Bell should have had the Osprey safe in the late 90s but they took an extra 10 years The neat thing about FVL is the 5 development categories: JMR-Light: Scout version to replace the OH-58 Kiowa; introduction planned for 2030. JMR-Medium-Light JMR-Medium: Utility and attack versions to replace the UH-60 Black Hawk and AH-64 Apache; introduction planned for 2027–28. JMR-Heavy: Cargo version to replace the CH-47 Chinook; introduction planned for 2035, although Boeing expects 2060.[15] JMR-Ultra: New ultra-sized version for vertical lift aircraft with performance similar to fixed-wing tactical transport aircraft, such as the C-130J Super Hercules and the Airbus A400M Atlas; introduction planned for 2025. The "JMR-Ultra" is going to be fucking neat, whatever it is Edited December 5, 2017 by GySgt Cole Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MAJ Carrera Posted December 5, 2017 (edited) Maybe something along the lines of what Karem offered during the Armys now defunct Joint Heavy Lift Program. possibly a way to revive the same idea under a new title. Picture is from Karems website. Edited December 5, 2017 by CW3 Carrera Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LTC Brueske Posted December 5, 2017 Maybe we could finally get something to actually lift the MRAP's in our missions Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cpl (Ret) Eagas Posted December 12, 2017 From what I am hearing on the Army side of things, they are proposing to have the airframes unmanned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MAJ Carrera Posted December 12, 2017 hmmm, not sure if we are quite ready for autonomous aircraft yet. We are still at infancy stages of autonomous cars. Also RIP Warrant Officers if that's the case. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cpl (Ret) Eagas Posted December 12, 2017 25 minutes ago, CW3 Carrera said: hmmm, not sure if we are quite ready for autonomous aircraft yet. We are still at infancy stages of autonomous cars. Also RIP Warrant Officers if that's the case. Not Autonomous. They would be flown remotely. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MAJ Carrera Posted December 12, 2017 I don't really see the point of the troop transports then if your going to have troops inside anyway then you might as well include a pilot and co pilot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cpl (Ret) Eagas Posted December 12, 2017 That is the argument that the aviators are making. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MAJ Carrera Posted March 22, 2019 About frickn' time. This thing has had enough setbacks. I am excite. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GySgt Cole Posted April 4, 2019 If sikorsky doesn't get the contract I'm going to shit my panties 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MAJ Carrera Posted March 5, 2020 Wondering if there is still interest in the unit regarding these programs, https://theaviationist.com/2020/03/05/u-s-armys-fara-program-what-we-know-about-all-the-oh-58d-kiowa-warrior-replacement-candidates/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HM1 (Ret) Speirs Posted March 6, 2020 These designs are all so insane to me, especially compared to how rugged and mean the 60 and 64 look 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MAJ Carrera Posted March 6, 2020 I really like Sikorsky's designs and want them to win, but they have had so many delays and setbacks during the program while the valor has not. I don't really like the tilt-rotor design you can basically kiss small LZ's goodby, the Valor is almost as wide as a blackhawk is long, rotor tip to tail. The "sleek" look they all have I think is an acceptable price to pay considering the advantages they have over the current ships, 64 payload aside. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MAJ Carrera Posted May 8, 2020 A good article by Pop Mech: https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a32319508/defiant-vs-valor-black-hawk-replacement/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites