Jump to content
NEWS
  • In Universe Dateline: Febuary 14th 2023
  • Tensions rise in South Africa after no clear winner in Presidential election
  • Bomb in Tehran cafĂ© kills three IRGC members, separatists suspected
  • Dominican Republic government on verge of collapse as gang violence escalates in Santa Domingo
  • Russia claims successful test of nuclear-powered cruise missile, experts remain skeptical
  • Man claims he was acting under Taylor Swift's secret orders after being arrested at NATO summit
  • Livonia detains 12 over suspected coup attempt
  • Sahrani troops disperse protest with gunfire, 8 reported dead
  • Hurricane rips through Florida Cemetery; Hundreds reported Dead
  • THESE HEADLINES ARE WORKS OF FICTION INTENDED TO SUPPORT THE STORYLINES OF THE 3d MRB REALISM UNIT

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/12/2021 in Posts

  1. 1 point
    Aloha dos amigos. Today I bring you a report on some testing I did for two of the more popular rifle rounds as well as a third that surprised me. I'll be posting screenshots with my analysis. To start I will describe the color gradient used to trace each shot fired. It's a script that you can place in a init.sqf file for a mission. Red means the bullet is traveling with 100%-75% of the muzzle velocity. Yellow means the bullet is traveling with 74%-50% of the muzzle velocity. Green means the bullet is traveling with 49%-25% of the muzzle velocity. Blue means the bullet is traveling with 24%-10% of the muzzle velocity. White means the bullet is traveling with less than 10% of the muzzle velocity. So up first is from RHS. It is the M856A1 with Tracers. My first set of targets are wood walls. Here you can see the rounds pass through 4 walls but only 3 walls are doing lethal damage afterwards. The last section would only cause bruising. The next part of the testing was on metal sheet fencing. It might be thinner but it slows bullets down a little bit better. It only made it through four sections however I'd call three still lethal with 1 additional being questionable. In conclusion, the M856A1 seems solid enough, but not compared to the next options. Up next is the 5.56mm EPR round used in the NiArms magazines. So the EPR manages to penetrate through 6 layers but only 4 of those I would consider lethal. On metal fencing it still fairs better than the M856A1 with 5 fences penetrated with still lethal velocity. So with this knowledge the NiArms EPR magazines are better than the M856A1 in the RHS rounds. However! I found another magazine in the arsenal that is superior to all others. I present the M995 AP rounds used by the ACE mod. Granted it means having STANAG instead of the cool looking PMAGs but just look at the work it does This little fuckers penetrated 9 wood walls with 7 what I would consider lethal or nearly lethal. It penetrates 10 walls of sheet metal with 8 of them in the lethal range. But that's not all. It can penetrate sandbags as well as sandbag bunkers. Still not good enough? It can penetrate brick fucking walls. As well as standard house walls. In conclusion, I will be putting M995 AP in all my weapons from this point forward. I plan to also test 7.62x51 NATO and trajectory differences between rounds to see if a round is better suited for close or far ranges. Hope some of you find this information helpful. I spent a long time getting this test to work. Probably 4+ hours. Enjoy!
  2. 1 point
    Testing shall be done tonight for armor testing along with weapon/barrel length. Way easier to test than trajectory/range efficiency.
  3. 1 point
    Do we have M995 "blacktip" in our regular arsenal? Also using it against unarmored targets would cause the bullet to zip right through the body without doing its usual tumbling and fragmenting. Thus doing less damage but I dont think ARMA simulates that.
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
  • Newsletter

    block_newsletter_signup

    Sign Up
×