Leaderboard

BREAKING: SECRET US SPECIAL FORCES OPERATION IN GUINEA EXPOSED — GLOBALISTS PANIC AS AMERICAN PATRIOTS STOP MASS SLAUGHTER! THEY LIED TO YOU AGAIN! For THREE WEEKS the corporate media has been running cover for what insiders are now calling the “Guinea Collapse Event” — a total implosion of the Guinean state triggered by CIA-backed coup factions, foreign mercenary networks, and transnational NGOs tied directly to the Brussels-Langley banking cartel. You think I’m joking? WHY are military satellites being repositioned over West Africa? WHY did encrypted traffic between NATO command nodes spike 800% overnight? WHY are unmarked cargo aircraft landing in neighboring countries with transponders disabled? Because this isn’t “civil unrest,” folks. THIS IS A LIVE EXPERIMENT! Sources embedded inside intelligence contracting groups tell us the situation on the ground has devolved into full ethnic extermination campaigns carried out by heavily armed militia factions using imported weapons that somehow magically crossed six borders without a single UN inspection team noticing. OH WOW! WHAT A COINCIDENCE! And now the same people who told you “nothing is happening” are suddenly evacuating diplomats under cover of darkness while special operations teams conduct unauthorized extraction missions deep inside contested territory. BUT HERE’S THE REAL STORY THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO HEAR! American operators reportedly discovered entire foreign civilian communities as well as foreign aid workers trapped behind militia checkpoints while these international aid organizations refused to intervene because acknowledging the massacres would “destabilize regional messaging frameworks.” THAT’S A REAL TERM THEY USE. “MESSAGING FRAMEWORKS.” Human beings are being butchered while bureaucrats in air-conditioned compounds argue over public relations optics and diversity briefing documents. Meanwhile, global media outlets are under direct pressure to suppress reports of targeted killings because it would “complicate the geopolitical narrative.” In other words: the truth is bad for business. And who’s funding this chaos? Follow the money. Mineral conglomerates. Private military contractors. Cryptocurrency laundering pipelines. Defense lobbyists. The same supranational think tanks that engineered disasters across Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and South America for thirty straight years. THEY CREATE THE CRISIS! THEN THEY SELL THE SOLUTION! But something went wrong in Guinea. According to leaked chatter from intelligence circles, US special forces on the ground began disobeying containment directives after witnessing atrocities firsthand. Instead of merely extracting embassy personnel, operators allegedly started moving civilians through covert evacuation corridors against direct recommendations from international “observers.” Translation? Patriots inside the machine saw the horror and decided they weren’t going to sit there while innocents got fed into the grinder for another globalist regime-change operation. They are putting an end to the white Genocide in Guinea. And when they come back they'll put an end to the white genocide happening in our country for they now have seen the truth! But for now the Deep State is furious. WHY do you think the media suddenly stopped talking about Guinea entirely? WHY are social media posts disappearing? WHY are independent journalists getting shadowbanned the moment they mention militia atrocities? Because the narrative collapsed. The elites wanted another controlled destabilization event they could exploit for resources, surveillance expansion, and regional dependency. Instead, the situation spun out of control and exposed the entire rotten system. This is what the New World Order looks like in practice: manufactured collapse, resource extraction, mass displacement, and information warfare designed to make you doubt your own eyes. Today it’s Guinea. Tomorrow it’ll be somewhere else. And while the technocrats lecture you about democracy and humanitarian values, black-budget aircraft are flying through African night skies carrying people out of kill zones the media pretends don’t exist. WAKE UP SHEEPLE! The battle is no longer left versus right. It’s humanity versus the machine. And the machine is getting desperate. Jones Alex, Databattles - because there is a battle for your mind!

Embassy Evacuated, But Questions Mount After Failed U.S. Special Operations Mission in Guinea The evacuation of the U.S. Embassy in Guinea has been hailed by military officials as a textbook example of crisis response under fire. Yet even as the last American diplomats departed the country aboard Marine helicopters, serious questions are emerging about a separate operation that ended in confusion, casualties, and a strategic setback for U.S. forces. According to multiple defense officials speaking on condition of anonymity, a covert U.S. special operations mission conducted during the final days of the embassy evacuation encountered unexpectedly fierce resistance from pro-government militia forces, resulting in the deaths of several American special forces soldiers and the loss of critical equipment allegedly including a special operations helicopter. The operation's failure stands in stark contrast to the widely praised performance of the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), which successfully executed the rapid evacuation of embassy staff without a single reported casualty. A Successful Evacuation As violence intensified across Guinea following the death of President Sekouba Soumah and the subsequent military coup, Washington ordered the evacuation of diplomatic personnel. The task fell largely to the 24th MEU, deployed offshore aboard an amphibious readiness group positioned in the Gulf of Guinea. Over a period of less than twenty-four hours, Marine helicopters conducted repeated flights between the embassy compound and naval vessels offshore. Security teams established defensive positions around the embassy while Marines escorted diplomats and staff to the extraction helicopters - keeping cool under sporadic fire from the neighboring buildings and streets. Defense officials described the operation as orderly despite growing instability in Guinea. "The Marines executed exactly the mission they were given," one senior Pentagon official said. "They maintained security, extracted personnel, and avoided escalation." By the end of the operation, the embassy had been fully evacuated. A Different Mission At roughly the same time, however, another American operation was unfolding further away inland. According to officials familiar with post-operation reviews, a special operations task force had been deployed to gather intelligence on militia activities and block potential enemy reinforcements to the evacuation site. Instead, the team reportedly encountered a large concentration of fighters affiliated with the Guinean Movement for the Preservation of National Dignity (GMPND), a pro-government militia accused of carrying out attacks against Fulani communities. What happened next remains disputed. Defense officials acknowledge that the special operations soldiers came under heavy fire and were forced into an emergency extraction under hostile conditions. Several aircraft were reportedly diverted from other missions to assist in the recovery effort. Intelligence Failure or Operational Miscalculation? Early assessments suggest planners may have significantly underestimated militia strength in the area. For months, American intelligence agencies had characterized many pro-government militia groups as lightly organized formations possessing little more than small arms and improvised vehicles. But by the time U.S. personnel arrived in the region, militia fighters had apparently established fortified positions, observation posts, and coordinated communications networks. Former military officers reviewing available information have suggested the force may have walked into what amounted to a prepared defensive zone rather than an isolated militia encampment. "The assumption was that these were irregular fighters with limited organization," said one retired special operations commander. "What they encountered appears to have been something much more structured." The Growing Power of Militias The incident highlights a broader challenge facing policymakers attempting to understand Guinea's rapidly evolving conflict. Since the military coup, armed groups have proliferated across the country. While the junta retains formal control of much of the Guinean military, vast rural areas are increasingly dominated by militias, local strongmen, and ethnic self-defense organizations. Several of these groups now possess considerable local intelligence networks and enjoy support from portions of the population. As a result, foreign military forces operating in the region face an environment where traditional assumptions about irregular warfare may no longer apply. "The distinction between militia and local authority is disappearing in some districts," said one regional analyst. "That creates enormous challenges for outside actors." Political Fallout Members of Congress have already requested classified briefings regarding the failed operation. Questions are expected to focus on intelligence preparation, mission objectives, and whether sufficient consideration was given to the rapidly changing conditions on the ground. The Pentagon has declined to discuss specific operational details but confirmed that an after-action review is underway. Meanwhile, military officials continue to point to the embassy evacuation as evidence that American forces successfully achieved their primary objective: the safe removal of U.S. diplomatic personnel from an increasingly dangerous conflict zone. Yet as Guinea's crisis deepens, the contrast between the two missions may become a defining lesson of the intervention. One operation demonstrated the strengths of conventional crisis response under clear objectives and strict command structures. The other revealed the risks of operating in a country where authority has fragmented, information is unreliable, and armed groups are often far stronger than they appear from a distance. For Washington, the embassy is gone, the diplomats are safe, and the Marines have returned to sea. But the conflict that produced the crisis shows no sign of ending. Peter Retchets Grand Central Time

FIELD ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM Guinea Internal Conflict Escalation Restricted Distribution / Immediate Release to 3d MRB S-2 Intelligence FROM: Mr. Black TO: West Africa Desk DATE: 09OCT25 SUBJECT: Escalating Ethnic Killings Conducted by Pro-Government Militias in Central Guinea Recent intelligence gathering from central Guinea indicates a rapid escalation in organized ethnic violence targeting Fulani civilian populations in areas under partial control or influence of pro-government militia formations aligned with the ruling GGNS military junta. Multiple independent local sources, humanitarian contacts, and intercepted communications suggest militia units associated with the Guinean Movement for the Preservation of National Dignity (GMPND) have conducted coordinated clearing operations in villages surrounding the prefecture of Al Quisa and surrounding prefectures. The operations appear designed not merely to suppress insurgent activity, but to collectively punish communities suspected of sympathizing with Fulani armed resistance groups. Civilian Killings Witness testimony collected over the last 48 hours describes: House-to-house searches targeting Fulani families Forced disappearances of adult males Execution-style killings near temporary militia checkpoints Destruction of livestock reserves and grain storage Systematic burning of abandoned villages Several survivors reported militia fighters accusing civilians of “harboring traitors” and “protecting enemies of Guinea.” The majority of reporting attributes operational leadership in the region to militia commander Hassan-Brahim Zambo, a former local security organizer who has emerged as one of the most influential pro-junta militia leaders outside the capital. Zambo reportedly commands several hundred irregular fighters operating alongside sympathetic local security personnel. Witnesses consistently describe his forces as highly mobile, lightly motorized, and operating with apparent confidence that they will not face intervention from state authorities. Mass Grave Allegations Three separate local contacts reported the discovery or construction of suspected mass burial sites near abandoned settlements north of Al Quisa. One site was corrobated by preleminary on the ground intelligence gathering by CIA field operatives and 3d MRB personnel. Satellite review remains inconclusive due to terrain and vegetation cover, but imagery analysts identified multiple areas of disturbed earth consistent with hurried excavation activity near militia-controlled road corridors for the other sites. One source described civilians being forced at gunpoint to dig trenches before being transported away in yellow trucks. The final disposition of those detainees remains unknown. Exact casualty figures cannot currently be verified. However, humanitarian estimates suggest the number of civilians killed in recent anti-Fulani operations may already be in the high hundreds. The violence is expected to rise and the casualty numbers will increase accordingly without intervention. Information Environment State-aligned broadcasters and pro-junta political figures continue amplifying rhetoric linking Fulani communities broadly to “terrorism,” “treason,” and alleged responsibility for the death of President Sekouba Soumah. A fulani helicopter mechanic has been publicly executed for treason in the death of the president. There is no intelligence corroborating these claims. This messaging appears to be contributing directly to militia mobilization and retaliatory violence. The distinction between armed insurgents and civilians is increasingly absent from public security discourse. Several regional observers warn the conflict is beginning to exhibit characteristics associated with early-stage mass atrocity environments: Ethnic scapegoating Militia decentralization Dehumanizing propaganda Population displacement Informal detention networks Collective punishment operations Assessment Current trends suggest the junta may be either unwilling or unable to restrain aligned militia actors operating in rural areas. The emergence of Hassan-Brahim Zambo as a prominent field commander is particularly concerning due to: His growing regional influence Apparent operational autonomy Use of ethnically targeted rhetoric Expanding recruitment networks among nationalist youth groups Absent meaningful external pressure or internal fragmentation within the junta, further escalation against Fulani civilian populations is likely. The situation is increasingly moving beyond counterinsurgency dynamics toward organized communal violence. Outlook If current militia operations continue unchecked, Guinea risks entering a self-sustaining cycle of ethnic reprisals and mass displacement. The greatest immediate danger is that localized killings evolve into normalized regional cleansing campaigns carried out under the justification of restoring national security. At present, fear — rather than formal state authority — is becoming the primary governing force across large sections of the interior.

RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE DE LA SÉCURITÉ EXTÉRIEURE CLASSIFICATION: TRÈS SECRET EYES ONLY — PRÉSIDENT DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE / NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISORS / CEMA (Chef d'État-Major des Armées) FROM: Directeur Général de la Sécurité Extérieure TO: Président de la République SUBJECT: Guinean Transitional Council Allegations and Regional Operational Assessment DATE: October 9th, 2025 Mr. President, Following the public accusations issued by the Guinean Transitional Military Council, I can formally confirm that the allegations directed toward the French Republic, the DGSE, and associated humanitarian organizations are false and unsupported by any operational record available to this Directorate. France is not conducting offensive intelligence, destabilization, or paramilitary operations within Guinea. No French personnel have participated in hostile actions against Guinean military forces, and no authorized operation exists aimed at undermining the current transitional government through covert action or armed intervention. The accusations concerning IDAP are likewise without factual basis. Current reporting indicates the organization has operated primarily in a humanitarian and logistical support role within affected civilian sectors. We have identified no evidence that IDAP facilities knowingly supported espionage operations or armed militant activity under French direction. Our assessment remains that the Guinean leadership is intentionally weaponizing anti-French sentiment to consolidate domestic authority amid worsening internal instability, insurgent violence, and international isolation. The invocation of “colonial restoration” narratives appears specifically designed to mobilize nationalist sentiment while legitimizing emergency security measures and the detention of foreign personnel. The junta’s decision to classify all IDAP personnel and affiliated aid workers as potential spies significantly increases the likelihood of arbitrary detention operations and forced confessions intended for state media exploitation. That said, several operational details surrounding the checkpoint engagement warrant close scrutiny. The two deceased foreign nationals described by Guinean authorities do not correspond to any known DGSE personnel, assets, or partner operatives currently assigned to the region. All French intelligence personnel operating within West Africa remain fully accounted for. Furthermore, military descriptions of the individuals involved — including advanced encrypted communications equipment, tactical mobility, weapons handling standards, and extraction-oriented logistical preparation — are inconsistent with current French clandestine operating doctrine in the region. Signals intercepts collected during the forty-eight hours preceding the incident identified communications patterns in southern Guinea bearing stronger resemblance to American special mission support architectures than to any known French intelligence framework presently active in West Africa. Additional indicators include irregular aerial traffic activity across neighboring states, increased offshore military posture in the Gulf of Guinea, and unusual compartmentalized communications routing associated with Western security elements operating outside established NATO coordination mechanisms. While no definitive conclusion can yet be established, available intelligence suggests the possibility that unilateral American contingency operations may have been underway independently and without prior consultation with French regional partners. The Guinean government’s immediate exploitation of the incident appears intended to remove foreign observers from contested areas before broader domestic security operations commence. The military seizure of aid compounds and communications infrastructure will likely reduce independent visibility into civilian casualty events and counterinsurgency actions over the coming weeks. Recommendations follow: Publicly reject all Guinean accusations in unequivocal diplomatic terms. Avoid direct public speculation regarding possible American involvement while pursuing urgent clarification through liaison channels. Coordinate with European and ECOWAS partners regarding the unlawful detention risk facing humanitarian personnel. Accelerate contingency evacuation planning for French nationals remaining inside Guinea. Increase intelligence surveillance coverage over Gulf of Guinea air corridors and adjacent regional logistics routes. Prepare for expanded information operations portraying France as the architect of regional destabilization and neo-colonial interference. At present, our assessment is that the Transitional Military Council is operating from a position of escalating paranoia compounded by fragmented battlefield awareness and mounting international isolation. Additional expulsions, detentions, and anti-Western propaganda operations remain highly probable in the immediate term. Respectfully, Admiral Laurent Delorme Directeur Général Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE TRANSITIONAL MILITARY COUNCIL OF THE REPUBLIC OF GUINEA OFFICE OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND SOVEREIGN INTEGRITY The Transitional Military Council announces that Guinean security forces operating near Jableh have eliminated two armed foreign operatives linked to an illegal French intelligence network operating inside the Republic of Guinea. The individuals ignored repeated orders to surrender and opened hostilities while attempting to cross into a restricted military security corridor. Both were neutralized by Guinean forces. Weapons, encrypted communications equipment, forged identification papers, and intelligence materials recovered at the scene confirm direct foreign involvement in ongoing destabilization efforts against the Guinean state. Preliminary investigations conducted by military intelligence indicate that the so-called International Development Assistance Program (IDAP) has been operating as a covert French proxy organization under the false cover of humanitarian work. Evidence suggests IDAP personnel have coordinated with French intelligence officers to gather military intelligence, transport illegal communications equipment, conceal armed actors inside aid compounds, and support efforts to undermine Guinea’s lawful transitional government. The Transitional Military Council further believes these operations are part of a broader French campaign to restore foreign political influence and re-establish colonial domination over Guinea through espionage, economic sabotage, disinformation, and armed subversion. Over the last twenty-four hours, multiple Guinean servicemen have been killed in attacks conducted near IDAP-controlled facilities and foreign aid encampments. Military investigators are examining direct connections between these attacks and French-backed operatives currently active inside the country. Accordingly, the following emergency security measures are now in effect nationwide: The French Ambassador is declared persona non grata and must leave Guinea within 24 hours. All French diplomatic, intelligence, and military personnel are ordered to depart Guinean territory immediately. All IDAP operations within Guinea are suspended indefinitely. Any individual employed by, cooperating with, or providing support to IDAP will be detained pending counterintelligence investigation. IDAP compounds, vehicles, warehouses, and communications infrastructure are now under military control. Foreign NGOs operating inside Guinea will undergo immediate security review and inspection. Expanded counterintelligence and border security operations are now authorized nationwide under emergency wartime authority. The Transitional Military Council warns all foreign governments against interference in Guinea’s internal affairs. Any nation found supporting armed groups, espionage networks, or attempts to destabilize the republic will face decisive retaliation. Guinea will never again submit to foreign occupation, foreign manipulation, or colonial control disguised as humanitarian assistance. The people of Guinea are urged to remain vigilant against foreign agents, collaborators, and disinformation campaigns designed to weaken national unity and sovereignty. Suspicious activity should be reported immediately to the nearest military authority. Issued on behalf of the Transitional Military Council General Sékouba Camara Conakry, Republic of Guinea

Age: 29 First Name: Matt Last Name: Costa Discord Username: Costa Steam Profile Link:http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198017417292 ArmA III Player ID: 76561198017417292 Desired Duty Assignment: 0372 Marine Raider How Long have you been playing ArmA III: Since 2013 Are you currently a member of an ArmA III gaming clan or unit?: Nope Do you own or, during the next time they are on sale, will you own the Arma 3 Apex and Contact DLCs? (Requirement) (I own it) Availability (Sunday/Saturday/Both): Mostly Sundays How did you find out about our unit? Originally Hart´s channel If you were recruited by one of our members, who was it? I came back Why do you want to join the 3rd Marine Raider Battalion? Because it rocks Do you understand the definition of realism gaming according to the 3d MRB and willing to abide by this game style? Yes Do you understand this unit is EST(GMT -5) time zoned based. Operations take place on Saturday at 1800 EST and Sunday at 2000 EST. Yes

Fair. And that suggestion should, and maybe was, be sent up the CoC to be appropriately handled and resolved. Gotcha. I never viewed those as conflicting but I'm glad you addressed it as its good to take note of. In my experience, and I cannot say how true to reason that stands, the role-playing falls in line easily after the professionalism and performance have been sorted out. I at least find it easier to role play as an MSOT Team Leader when things are going according to plan and my team is kicking ass, not when we are getting our asses handed to us because we didn't train something stupid like how to properly clear a house. Regardless, thanks for the feedback. Very true. However, there is nothing saying that grading everyone or consistent coaching kills the fun. It is very much a matter of opinion. That also said, I want to point back to that this has never been tried before. Assumptions are being made without trial, evidence, or experience. You may be 1000% correct in that opinion and I, along with everyone else, will find out in a month and a half if you were right or wrong. But progress is made by making mistakes and learning from them. Imagine for a moment that this worked and that it was discovered to be the funnest thing the unit had ever done and had people enjoying their time the most. (Granted that likely won't happen to that degree but I'm using it to make a point) We would never know if we never tried it. I'm not saying this is perfect. I'm not even saying its the best idea or the correct course of action. I'm saying its something innovative and different and we should at least see where that takes us. As part of the growing pains is failure, if we try this and two months later we are worse off from it, we have a plethora of knew knowledge to draw upon to make better decisions going forward. First please site me the sources and evidence. That's quite a claim and, while I'm willing to accept that, I won't do so lacking clear evidence pointing at that. Second: If there are problems people need to send them up. In my entire time in CS I can recall receiving only one complaint from the unit about the performance of CS and how we were running things. Sent up by Cole in a very irreverent manner, but I have to give him major credit that he actually bloody sent something up. He complained that we weren't being transparent enough and that the public thread was not being utilized appropriately. He was right. And from that we made changes. We limited discussions in OPSEC to disciplinary and awards based things, as they were supposed to be, and created the public portion of CS meetings as a result of that PM. So while its all well and good to accuse command level decisions of being the cause of burnout, if nothing is ever sent up and nothing ever gets on our desks, you have no-one to blame but yourselves. We cannot read minds; We are only mortals. And in your opinion you believed you could do it better. So you've gone and given it your shot at it, as you should. But for us, we're still figuring it out as we are still all relatively new to this whole running a unit thing. So as I have said and re-iterated more times than I can count, if there are problems send them up. We have to know about them to do anything about it. Growing Pains. Yes there is clearly an issue if that is happening. And we can pay attention, and we can pay that attention in the wrong ways if that happens. The reason words should come through official channels is because it then enables all persons involved to use their higher brain power and come to logical sensible conclusions rather than resulting to their base instincts of wanting to hurt other people and feel important. Command is just as susceptible to being drawn into that base, degrading, fighting and confrontational attitude as everyone else. Look at Dale and Harrison. If members went out of their way to be professional and send things up properly, you would find it would elicit better reactions from those in command simply because we can look at it objectively and not hate you for causing drama. TLDR; It doesn't need to go through those channels for us to notice, and we do notice, but if it does it's a lot less dramatic and a lot nicer for everyone involved. Why would go beat up your brother over him taking your book rather than just go ask for it back? It's why society has evolved (mostly) to where lawyers and courts are used to settle disputes over going over and shooting your neighbor because he took some of your corn. Fair. I think our official definition of realism needs to be seriously looked at, considered, and updated to reflect fully what this unit is striving to be. Thank's for the advice.