Jump to content
NEWS
  • In Universe Dateline: Febuary 14th 2023
  • Tensions rise in South Africa after no clear winner in Presidential election
  • Bomb in Tehran café kills three IRGC members, separatists suspected
  • Dominican Republic government on verge of collapse as gang violence escalates in Santa Domingo
  • Russia claims successful test of nuclear-powered cruise missile, experts remain skeptical
  • Man claims he was acting under Taylor Swift's secret orders after being arrested at NATO summit
  • Livonia detains 12 over suspected coup attempt
  • Sahrani troops disperse protest with gunfire, 8 reported dead
  • Hurricane rips through Florida Cemetery; Hundreds reported Dead
  • THESE HEADLINES ARE WORKS OF FICTION INTENDED TO SUPPORT THE STORYLINES OF THE 3d MRB REALISM UNIT

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/05/2018 in Posts

  1. 4 points
    I have a unique perspective where until a week or two ago I have pretty much Zeused every mission but my own since September. I've also been a CSO, Element Leader, Team Chief and now Team Leader. As S-2 OIC: I see people doing stupid shit all the time. Bad tactics, bad coverage, real simple stuff. Biggest advice: slow down. Slow is smooth and smooth is fast. When I see stupid things, I sort of see the reason why having things like more realistic damage and more punishing medical systems is good. If you don't have a punishment for doing stupid shit, what's stopping you? If Zeuses were out to punish and truly win, we'd be able to absolutely fuck up a lot of task forces. As Team Leader (and compiling my experience on every level of ground): It's very easy for me, Company and so on to watch from the back of the formation (or even better, Zeus) and say "C'mon guys, lock this shit up and don't get shot", when obviously the truth is much more grey than that. Harsh stamina and medical systems I found to be more aggravating than encouraging. I've said before in similar threads that I'm here for realism in tactics and procedures, not for realism in gameplay consequences. This is still true, but I do see the need for those gameplay consequences on a fundamental level. Combining my thoughts from above with this, I think instead of pursuing this level of technical punishment, we should be pushing ourselves at every level of leadership to be better at tactics and procedures, which is what we're all actually here for. If Battalion, Company, Team HQs and Element Leaders can't slow down and iron out the basics to the intermediate, we have bigger problems than harsher consequences can fix. Carrot before the stick in this case. On CASEVACs Really cool for JTACs, pilots, flight medics. Really sucks if you're a CSO who flashed themselves and took a rifle round because a door was open on your screen but wasn't actually in game logic. Very few people on ground want to be told "oh yeah you're technically good but we're flying you back to base for immersion". Frankly we take too many casualties and our air-ground interaction is not at the point where this can be evenhandedly implemented.
  2. 4 points
    The biggest thing we could try and introduce is medevacs, some of the injuries we sustain in the field would not be treatable in the field. While this would make for a massive logistical undertaking, I think it would be interesting to employ medevacs and maybe even sarcs or other personnel that could fill in and act as medical crew onboard. Two ways we could utilize it is have a medical helicopter fly in and stay until wounded are treated, which is dangerous, but faster. Or like a traditional medevac and take the wounded back to base. I think this would be interesting and include some more realism but also maybe making people think about how they operate. EDIT: these medevac teams could also act as CSAR for downed aircraft It would be pretty badass to act as CSAR/PJ
  3. 4 points
  4. 3 points
    I just wanne debate about pushing for more realism into our current setup. With the new medical where limb damage is there i kinda feel we are pushing for more realism and sacrificing fun for it, I understand some people want more realism but i feel we are pushing to much for it. I just wanne have a discussion about it KEEP IT CIVIL!!!!
  5. 3 points
    I think that in a perfect world in a perfect game the limping would be a nice addition, however arma is not a perfect game. I think that having the limitation of speed imposed on you is hard and at many times infuriating, especially when its out of your control and your on a tight time table and don't have time to stop and get a medic and hold still for 30 seconds, I would be in favor of bringing back bandages can heal limbs. I however wasn't in favor of advanced medical as I am a simple man and didn't much care to learn it, so take that as you will.
  6. 3 points
  7. 2 points
    Having been on the reciveing end of the new feature, whitout being told it was an implemented feature. I can say that it add nothing to the fun aspect of the game. It is 100% annoying and frustrating and should be binned yesterday.
  8. 2 points
    Literary typing this as you posted... pilot slots are already medics via ACE so we could incorporate crew chief slots which is already being talked about and they can act somthing like a PJ. yes they are light they are a pliable metal sheet with foam glued to the sides probably about 3-4 ounces each dont think you would be able to use it as a tourniquet.
  9. 2 points
    I don't want to poison the well by commenting out of the gate. But this thread will be watched like a hawk. Everyone's opinion matters.
  10. 2 points
    When I was planning the Tanoa deployment
  11. 2 points
  12. 1 point
    It's quite unfortunate that I can nail a dude with multiple shots, have him turn, look at me, and unload which results in my being broken until I can get the proper assistance. Arma suffers from being Arma -- and I find it unfair to be subject to a limp or perma-sway because the target that would realistically be dead is not. Obviously this is a single instance and doesn't account for poor individual performance, but there needs to be an appropriate solution for people.
  13. 1 point
  14. 1 point
    I honestly believe that limping around for an entire FTX because the SARCs forgot a PAK, sacrifices large amounts of fun for a small portion of realism. I believe that it’d be in our best interest to be reasonable and approach this ‘Realism Unit’ realistically from another angle, rather than introduce an annoying mechanic; that in turn can be vastly detremental.
  15. 1 point
    That’s not how splints work bro. Yes if you wish to make one out of some tourniquets and twigs you could probably reuse one. the splints we use are mailable and you fit it to fit the specific wound. I’m not a medic and it’s been a minute since I prepped one so I could totally be wrong. Just have the SARCs carry multiple splints, they should be pretty light.
  16. 1 point
    mrw Operation Rising Trident part 2 (pls god no more IDF)
  17. 1 point
  18. 1 point
  19. 1 point
    "That kevlar wasn't yours to lose!"
  20. 1 point
  21. 1 point
    Yeah I'm friends with like every Australian that's been in this unit and this list is sorely missing "Cunt". Fake news
  22. 1 point
  23. 1 point
    When you live in a very confusing state.
  24. 1 point
  25. 1 point
    You Norwegians need to stop being happy and independent and accept the house of Bernadotte as your rightful sovereigns.
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
  • Newsletter

    block_newsletter_signup

    Sign Up
×